[VoIP] Status monitoring

[Ian Jolly]

Interesting to see how many working Asterisk Tandems there are in the 
US/Canada which are not listed on the /192  page.

I keep any eye on the UK switches - I'm the one with plenty of information 
on the old STD(DDD) codes so tend to get involved when some-one is looking 
for an 'authentic' old code.

I also been working on a CNET codebook for UK/Irish/New Zealand codes and 
numbers - it is a replica of the British Post Office STD Codebook of the 
1960's - the early days of long distance dialling here in the UK.  It lives 
as a PDF file on the UK website, such that members can download it and print 
it out to have their own copy. It is nearing completion.

Ian Jolly
+64 85 32 889 from CNET
+44 (0)  352      82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!) from 
CNET - the Heritage Telephone Network
+44 (0)1352 83 82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!) from  Public 
Telephone Network
FWD Telephone No  83 2230


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shane Young" <voiptandem at shaneyoung.com>
To: <voip at lists.ckts.info>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Status monitoring


> Because we use DNS and ENUM for our routing, anyone can see if an
> office code is routed to a tandem.
>
> I did a simple query of every 1-NXX starting with 201 and compared it
> to what's listed on the wiki:
> http://www.shaneyoung.com/cnet/audit/
>
> It's not pretty and it needs a little fine tuning, but I'll keep this
> up to date and go from there.
>
>
>
> Quoting Dennis D Hock <hockd at dteenergy.com>:
>
>>
>> Don,
>>
>> I believe it was an attempt by Don to determine whose tandem was up and
>> running.  In the opening pages on the site Greg set up it mentions some
>> common numbers.  I believe Don was using the defined nxx-0002 ( or was it
>> nxx-0020) to provide the office milliwatt function.  He would place
>> automated calls to each exchanmge to verify if they were up and able to
>> take calls.
>>
>> I thought it was still running but don't remember hearing anything about 
>> it
>> of late or even early.  ;-)
>>
>> Dennis Hock
>>
>> -----voip-bounces at lists.ckts.info wrote: -----
>>
>>
>> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at lists.ckts.info>
>> From: Donald Froula <dfroula at sbcglobal.net>
>> Sent by: voip-bounces at lists.ckts.info
>> Date: 08/26/2007 10:31AM
>> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Status monitoring
>>
>> I had never heard of this. It sounds interesting.
>>
>> I have a milliwatt test line, but it is accessible via
>> MF only. If this exists, I will define a regular
>> number for it.
>>
>> What is the purpose of keeping such a record? Does it
>> show whose tandem is active? How often does it poll?
>> Is the information available on-line?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Don
>> --- Paul Wills <pdwills at cedarknolltelephone.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is anyone still maintaining the automated routine
>>> that checks each CNET
>>> exchange for 1000Hz as a means of maintaining a
>>> record of who's on line?  If
>>> so, I have to add an extension.
>
> --Shane
> +1-821-7311 CNET
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at lists.ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.9/975 - Release Date: 26/08/2007 
> 21:34
>