[VoIP] Returning CNET numbers

[Chad Perkins]

On 21 Nov 2007 at 20:20, Paul Wills wrote:

> I believe that there were some who proposed that NXX-0002 be a
> standard 1000 Hz. tone number.
> 
> I believe Chad Perkin's status monitor depends on it.
> PDW

I've been quietly listening to this thread waiting to see if some bright light would 
appear at the end of the tunnel; after a couple weeks I have not seen any.

Any body figure out how how we can fix this?  The CNET Milliwatt Test depends on 
getting through to a standard number on each exchange (NXX).

0002 has been a quasi CNET standard for a couple years now.  It was the most 
widely implemented "standard" test number on CNET long before even I joined.  One 
thousand block pooling breaks the CNETMWT script in a pretty significant way. I only 
see three solutions:

1. Build a stand-alone database of everyones MW, keep up adds, moves, changes 
(can you say, No)
2. Send Greg all the code, html and scripts to build into the web site (possible, not all 
too pretty)
3. Evolve to a number plan where thousand block pooling isn't necessary (i.e. 
predivestiture? North American number plan, kind of like UK folks did).

Anyone who has ideas on this is welcome join the conference bridge (+1 700-2663) 
tonight (6 pm ET) for a detailed explanation / brain storming session in lieu of a lot of 
replies here on the list.

Chad Perkins
+1 955-9924

 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "john jones" <jjones3601 at yahoo.com>
> To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> 
> 
> > The idea is for you to pick a number in 594-3xxx and it will be
> > marked as a reachability test number.  It can be anything you want.
> >
> > John
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Paul Wills <pdwills at cedarknolltelephone.com>
> > To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:49:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> >
> >
> > I just thought of something (dangerous though that may be!):
> >
> > I relinquished everything but the 594-3XXX block of 1000 and just
> > realized that my 1000 Hz tone, as per some "standard" is located at
> > 594-0002 (as are a few other "special" numbers.)
> >
> > What will the new standard for the milliwatt tone be since some
> > people use it to verify the status of the switch?
> >
> > PDW
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date:
> 11/21/07 10:01 AM
>