[VoIP] Returning CNET numbers

[john jones]

I'm around now.

John

1.687.7700

----- Original Message ----
From: Chad Perkins <chad at maine.edu>
To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 4:53:39 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers


On 21 Nov 2007 at 17:41, john jones wrote:

> Yes, but that needs to evolve to deal with 1000 number assignments. 
> While the concept of using NXX-X002 as the "new" standard, it was
 felt
> that it would be more "friendly" and not very much more difficult to
> allow a user to indicate ANY number in their block as a standard test
> number.

That's a problem.
 
> Greg needs to update the database structure to accommodate this and
> Chad will need to update his application as well.
> JJ

How is the script to know which thousand blocks have been activated?
  If you are 
around tonight at 6 o'clock, I could use all the ideas I can get.

Chad
 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Paul Wills <pdwills at cedarknolltelephone.com>
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:20:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> 
> 
> I believe that there were some who proposed that NXX-0002 be a
> standard
>  1000 
> Hz. tone number.
> 
> I believe Chad Perkin's status monitor depends on it.
> 
> PDW
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "john jones" <jjones3601 at yahoo.com>
> To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> 
> 
> > The idea is for you to pick a number in 594-3xxx and it will be
>  marked as 
> > a reachability test number.  It can be anything you want.
> >
> > John
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Paul Wills <pdwills at cedarknolltelephone.com>
> > To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:49:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> >
> >
> > I just thought of something (dangerous though that may be!):
> >
> > I relinquished everything but the 594-3XXX block of 1000 and just
> > realized that my 1000 Hz tone, as per some "standard" is located at
> > 594-0002
>  (as
> > are
> > a few other "special" numbers.)
> >
> > What will the new standard for the milliwatt tone be since some
>  people
> > use
> > it to verify the status of the switch?
> >
> > PDW
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date:
> 11/21/07 10:01 AM
> 


_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/