[VoIP] Returning CNET numbers

[Jayson Smith]

Hi,

     Sorry I wasn't at the conference, I just missed it, didn't even know 
about it until now. That's what I get for not staying up long enough and 
checking my E-mail! Anyway, did anything useful come out of it?
Jayson

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chad Perkins" <chad at maine.edu>
To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers


> On 21 Nov 2007 at 20:20, Paul Wills wrote:
>
>> I believe that there were some who proposed that NXX-0002 be a
>> standard 1000 Hz. tone number.
>>
>> I believe Chad Perkin's status monitor depends on it.
>> PDW
>
> I've been quietly listening to this thread waiting to see if some bright 
> light would
> appear at the end of the tunnel; after a couple weeks I have not seen any.
>
> Any body figure out how how we can fix this?  The CNET Milliwatt Test 
> depends on
> getting through to a standard number on each exchange (NXX).
>
> 0002 has been a quasi CNET standard for a couple years now.  It was the 
> most
> widely implemented "standard" test number on CNET long before even I 
> joined.  One
> thousand block pooling breaks the CNETMWT script in a pretty significant 
> way. I only
> see three solutions:
>
> 1. Build a stand-alone database of everyones MW, keep up adds, moves, 
> changes
> (can you say, No)
> 2. Send Greg all the code, html and scripts to build into the web site 
> (possible, not all
> too pretty)
> 3. Evolve to a number plan where thousand block pooling isn't necessary 
> (i.e.
> predivestiture? North American number plan, kind of like UK folks did).
>
> Anyone who has ideas on this is welcome join the conference bridge (+1 
> 700-2663)
> tonight (6 pm ET) for a detailed explanation / brain storming session in 
> lieu of a lot of
> replies here on the list.
>
> Chad Perkins
> +1 955-9924
>
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "john jones" <jjones3601 at yahoo.com>
>> To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
>>
>>
>> > The idea is for you to pick a number in 594-3xxx and it will be
>> > marked as a reachability test number.  It can be anything you want.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----
>> > From: Paul Wills <pdwills at cedarknolltelephone.com>
>> > To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:49:43 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
>> >
>> >
>> > I just thought of something (dangerous though that may be!):
>> >
>> > I relinquished everything but the 594-3XXX block of 1000 and just
>> > realized that my 1000 Hz tone, as per some "standard" is located at
>> > 594-0002 (as are a few other "special" numbers.)
>> >
>> > What will the new standard for the milliwatt tone be since some
>> > people use it to verify the status of the switch?
>> >
>> > PDW
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoIP mailing list
>> VoIP at ckts.info
>> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
>> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.2/1143 - Release Date:
>> 11/21/07 10:01 AM
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>