[VoIP] Registered Jacks

[Steph Kerman]

No, an RJ9 would have to be a 6P4C termination.  The 6P2C termination and the 4P4C termination will have to duke it out for winner of the RJ7 title.

=SK=

-----Original Message-----
>From: Duncan Smith <duncan.b.smith at gmail.com>
>Sent: Dec 12, 2007 12:46 AM
>To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
>Subject: Re: [VoIP] Registered Jacks
>
>On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:28:11PM -0800, Mark Rudholm wrote:
>> So, given your obvious erudition on the topic, did you really not
>> know that "RJ9" was commonly used to refer to the 4-position jacks?
>> I always thought it was pretty commonly known, if not standard.
>
>I'm going to have to pipe up here, regardless of offtopicness.
>According to the discussion, RJ-9 doesn't mean anything.  But I grew
>up calling a 4P4C jack "RJ-9".
>
>I'd be willing to bet that it arose when someone saw an RJ-11 style
>(6P6C) and thought to themselves, "hmm, if a 6P6C is RJ-11, I bet a
>4P4C, two less, is an RJ-9, two less!"
>
>-- 
>Duncan Smith  --------\    http://students.washington.edu/f/    /---
>  ()  ascii ribbon     \--- Signed/encrypted mail preferred ---/
>  /\    campaign    [ against html mail ]  [ support open formats ]
>_______________________________________________
>VoIP mailing list
>VoIP at ckts.info
>http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
>Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/