[VoIP] Can this be done?

John Novack jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
Tue Jan 30 14:41:15 CST 2007


Blame Paul Wills for that
Some how he managed to do a reply to the list using your identity!

Either that or you really are one and the same, but your wives don't know!

On the original subject:
you didn't mention anything regarding the call to AU/NZ
Who will be joining CNET from Down Under?

John Novack


Ian Jolly wrote:
> I'm confused - I seem to have a split personality or I'm in two places at 
> once???  8^)("!!"$??$   :-))
>
> Ian J
>
> +44 (0)352 82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!)
> CNET - the Heritage Telephone Network
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ian Jolly" <ian at uax.org.uk>
> To: <voip at ckts.info>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:40 PM
> Subject: [VoIP] Can this be done?
>
>
>   
>> Here's one for the Asterisk experts:
>>
>> Is it possible to signal a distant extension without involving a calling 
>> extension?
>>
>> Specifically, I would like to make a one second "attempted" call to an E&M 
>> port.  This would cause the E lead to momentarily go "active."  By doing 
>> it as part of a context, I tie up the incoming channel for about five 
>> seconds before I can connect it to the channel I *really* want to connect 
>> it to.
>>
>> Ideally, I would like to call a routine to produce a quick operation of a 
>> distant E lead without getting any other channel involved.
>>
>> Does it sound possible?
>>
>> PDW
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>   


More information about the VoIP mailing list