[VoIP] Can this be done?
John Novack
jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org
Tue Jan 30 14:41:15 CST 2007
Blame Paul Wills for that
Some how he managed to do a reply to the list using your identity!
Either that or you really are one and the same, but your wives don't know!
On the original subject:
you didn't mention anything regarding the call to AU/NZ
Who will be joining CNET from Down Under?
John Novack
Ian Jolly wrote:
> I'm confused - I seem to have a split personality or I'm in two places at
> once??? 8^)("!!"$??$ :-))
>
> Ian J
>
> +44 (0)352 82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!)
> CNET - the Heritage Telephone Network
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Jolly" <ian at uax.org.uk>
> To: <voip at ckts.info>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:40 PM
> Subject: [VoIP] Can this be done?
>
>
>
>> Here's one for the Asterisk experts:
>>
>> Is it possible to signal a distant extension without involving a calling
>> extension?
>>
>> Specifically, I would like to make a one second "attempted" call to an E&M
>> port. This would cause the E lead to momentarily go "active." By doing
>> it as part of a context, I tie up the incoming channel for about five
>> seconds before I can connect it to the channel I *really* want to connect
>> it to.
>>
>> Ideally, I would like to call a routine to produce a quick operation of a
>> distant E lead without getting any other channel involved.
>>
>> Does it sound possible?
>>
>> PDW
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>
More information about the VoIP
mailing list