[VoIP] Asterisk-Adtran dial rate

[Lee Spenadel]

Never mind, a mistake.

-----Original Message-----
From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] On Behalf Of
Lee Spenadel
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 5:00 PM
To: 'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk-Adtran dial rate

BTW, the Kerman message has been updated at 349-0666.

-----Original Message-----
From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] On Behalf Of
Kirt Stanfield
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:20 AM
To: ikjtel
Cc: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk-Adtran dial rate

Max,

Sorry if I wasn't clear - I will try to be more careful in the future-

The good news is that I experimentally verified what you said. The 
following settings seemed to improve the dialing accuracy a bit:

PULSEBREAK=60
PULSEMAKE=40

Now one odd thing - the Digit Grabber still reports 13 PPS.

So I tried another variant - I multiplied each of the above by 13/10 on 
the assumption that if they are if fact absolute timings that doing so 
would get me closer to 10 PPS. That did NOT work, or at least the digit 
grabber still reported 13 PPS. Two possible conclusions:

1. The digit grabber is wrong.
2. The above values are some sort of % instead of absolute millisecond 
timings.


Kirt


ikjtel wrote:

>--- Kirt Stanfield <kirtley.stanfield at comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Max,
>>
>>I tried changing the PULSEMAKE and PULSEBREAK. It
>>did seem to make some 
>>difference, I just have yet to home in on optimal
>>values. IF these are 
>>in fact milliseconds it would seem that 60/40 would
>>give 10 pps. It 
>>doesn't quite seem to work that way. In fact it
>>seems to work better 
>>when I set to 40/60, the exact opposite of what I
>>would think, but it 
>>still pulses at about 13pps. Gues I will try some
>>simple math and ratio 
>>both up by 13/10 for the next try.
>>    
>>
>
>OK, the above is ambiguous.  Can't tell which one
>(MAKE or BREAK) you're setting to 60 and which to 40.
>
>I would say that proper values for Bell System dials
>would be
>PULSEBREAK=60
>PULSEMAKE=40
>
>(FWIW my ITT/Kellogg TIMM-2 recommends 62/38 for the
>WE-clone dials used in their line of 500-series sets)
>
>Also, still waiting for you to answer what the pulsing
>sounds like (regular or erratic) from a monitor set...
>
>Also, how much do you trust your 13pps figure???  The
>amount of error (30%) is suspicious.  You should be
>able to compare the speed against a known dial...
>
>Max
>
>
> 
>___________________________________________________________________________
_________
>8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
>with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
>http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
>
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/

_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/