[VoIP] Asterisk-Adtran dial rate

[Kirt Stanfield]

Corrections below

Kirt Stanfield wrote:

>Max,
>
>This morning I just did the exercise of watching the Asterisk-Adtran 
>pulsing right after pulsing from a dial.
>
>1. There is definitely a hesititaion between some digits. I think  about 
>every 3rd digit is delayed.
>  
>
I meant the third pulse not third digit sorry

>2. Using larger numbers (but with the same ratio) in the make (52) and 
>break  (78) constnts in zaptel.h does slow the pulsing down - and also 
>makes the above more obvious.
>
>The good news is that the settings I have now seem to also workaround 
>the dialing errors. I think even  40 and 60 might do this. I will try 
>them again.
>
>Sorry getting to the above was so painful. Keeping time was my downfall 
>when I tried piano!
>
>Kirt
>
>ikjtel wrote:
>
>  
>
>>--- Kirt Stanfield <kirtley.stanfield at comcast.net>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>grabber still reported 13 PPS. Two possible
>>>conclusions:
>>>
>>>1. The digit grabber is wrong.
>>>2. The above values are some sort of % instead of
>>>absolute millisecond 
>>>timings.
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>OK.   These values are indeed absolute quantities in
>>milliseconds - they're NOT relative nor percent etc.
>>
>>However, I still want to know if you can listen to the
>>pulsing - it seems likely that you'll also experience
>>the erratic pulsing - in which case the monitor may be
>>trying its best to decode a bad pulse stream...
>>
>>Max
>>
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________________________________
>>Don't pick lemons.
>>See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>>http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>VoIP mailing list
>VoIP at ckts.info
>http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
>Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>
>  
>