[VoIP] Asterisk vs. others

[Greg Blakely]

It'd be valuable to the welcome page on the website to present new CNETters
with the easiest possible setup.

It would be a good project for those up to the task to make an
ease-of-installation comparison between the various platforms.

Then, what?  The easiest 2 or 3 could have installation instructions?  

Thoughts, anyone? 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] 
> On Behalf Of ikjtel
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:07 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others
> 
> --- David Josephson <david at josephson.com> wrote:
> 
> > Has anyone played with these other systems?
> 
> Another one is freeswitch [www.freeswitch.org]
> 
> I agree with the following quote (note the unfavorable 
> comparison to the unnamed asterisk) 
> 
> "FreeSWITCH has the potential to also implement a PBX but it 
> is not mandated to. Think of it as a lower level application 
> than a PBX. It's possible to load several modules into 
> FreeSWITCH to make it behave exactly like a cluster of PBX 
> applications. This is entirely easier than trying to make a 
> single monolithic PBX behave as a switch especially when much 
> of the PBX functionality is permanently built into the core 
> of the PBX application."
> 
> http://www.voip-news.com/feature/tony-minnesale-freeswitch-voi
> p-062106/
> 
> Max
> 
> 
>        
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! 
> Autos new Car Finder tool.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/