[VoIP] Asterisk vs. others

[Ian Jolly]

We have a number of sample configurations modified for UK/NZ use on the 
CNET-UK-I groups Files pages plus a few other files for hints on how to load 
sound files into Asterisk etc.

It is an on-going project!

Ian Jolly
+64 85 32 864 CNET in NZ
+44 (0)  352      82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!) from 
CNET - the Heritage Telephone Network
+44 (0)1352 83 82 26 (via a 1929 GPO Rural Automatic eXchange!) from  Public 
Telephone Network
FWD Telephone No  83 2230


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee Spenadel" <lee at spenadel.com>
To: <greg at vyger.net>; "'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'" 
<voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others


>I think that's a great, especially for people who either don't know Linux 
>or
> are not switchers.  I'd be happy to volunteer some generic conf files
> (Zapata, SIP, Extensions, Macros) that include the dialing basics (US 
> only)
> with commented out steps on where you would place your office code
> information, how to set up zap channels, etc.
>
> Lee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] On Behalf Of
> Greg Blakely
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 12:19 AM
> To: 'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others
>
> It'd be valuable to the welcome page on the website to present new 
> CNETters
> with the easiest possible setup.
>
> It would be a good project for those up to the task to make an
> ease-of-installation comparison between the various platforms.
>
> Then, what?  The easiest 2 or 3 could have installation instructions?
>
> Thoughts, anyone?
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info]
>> On Behalf Of ikjtel
>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:07 PM
>> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
>> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others
>>
>> --- David Josephson <david at josephson.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Has anyone played with these other systems?
>>
>> Another one is freeswitch [www.freeswitch.org]
>>
>> I agree with the following quote (note the unfavorable
>> comparison to the unnamed asterisk)
>>
>> "FreeSWITCH has the potential to also implement a PBX but it
>> is not mandated to. Think of it as a lower level application
>> than a PBX. It's possible to load several modules into
>> FreeSWITCH to make it behave exactly like a cluster of PBX
>> applications. This is entirely easier than trying to make a
>> single monolithic PBX behave as a switch especially when much
>> of the PBX functionality is permanently built into the core
>> of the PBX application."
>>
>> http://www.voip-news.com/feature/tony-minnesale-freeswitch-voi
>> p-062106/
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ______________________
>> Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo!
>> Autos new Car Finder tool.
>> http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoIP mailing list
>> VoIP at ckts.info
>> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
>> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/898 - Release Date: 12/07/2007 
> 16:08
>