[VoIP] Asterisk vs. others

[Dennis D Hock]

I think this is wonderful that we have all come so far and share our
information and setups.

I'd say if you can and have the time more power to you to help even some of
us already on the network.

Thank you from me,

Dennis Hock

-----voip-bounces at ckts.info wrote: -----


To: <greg at vyger.net>, "'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'"
<voip at ckts.info>
From: "Lee Spenadel" <lee at spenadel.com>
Sent by: voip-bounces at ckts.info
Date: 07/13/2007 08:03AM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others

I think that's a great, especially for people who either don't know Linux
or
are not switchers.  I'd be happy to volunteer some generic conf files
(Zapata, SIP, Extensions, Macros) that include the dialing basics (US only)
with commented out steps on where you would place your office code
information, how to set up zap channels, etc.

Lee


-----Original Message-----
From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] On Behalf Of
Greg Blakely
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 12:19 AM
To: 'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others

It'd be valuable to the welcome page on the website to present new CNETters
with the easiest possible setup.

It would be a good project for those up to the task to make an
ease-of-installation comparison between the various platforms.

Then, what?  The easiest 2 or 3 could have installation instructions?

Thoughts, anyone?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info]
> On Behalf Of ikjtel
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:07 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Asterisk vs. others
>
> --- David Josephson <david at josephson.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone played with these other systems?
>
> Another one is freeswitch [www.freeswitch.org]
>
> I agree with the following quote (note the unfavorable
> comparison to the unnamed asterisk)
>
> "FreeSWITCH has the potential to also implement a PBX but it
> is not mandated to. Think of it as a lower level application
> than a PBX. It's possible to load several modules into
> FreeSWITCH to make it behave exactly like a cluster of PBX
> applications. This is entirely easier than trying to make a
> single monolithic PBX behave as a switch especially when much
> of the PBX functionality is permanently built into the core
> of the PBX application."
>
> http://www.voip-news.com/feature/tony-minnesale-freeswitch-voi
> p-062106/
>
> Max
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo!
> Autos new Car Finder tool.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/

_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/

_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voipProject Web Page:
http://www.ckts.info/