[VoIP] Valid CLID

[Dennis D Hock]

I don't see how either of you could resemble that remark as you are both
from the industry.  The politicians have nothing better to do and certainly
have shown over time they don't understand anything more technical than
changing the batteries in a flashlight.  Beyond that they only see dollars
or the hope of them.

Dennis Hock

-----voip-bounces at ckts.info wrote: -----


To: <jnovack at stromberg-carlson.org>, "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog
Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
From: "Greg Blakely" <greg at vyger.net>
Sent by: voip-bounces at ckts.info
Date: 05/31/2007 10:03AM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Valid CLID



> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info]
> On Behalf Of John Novack
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:54 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Valid CLID
>
> used to be normal NANP, before all the political types stuck
> their fingers in the mix.
>
Harumph!  I resemble that remark...
_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voipProject Web Page:
http://www.ckts.info/