[VoIP] Numbering - existing use of 311

[Greg Blakely]

I have been dual-assigning member entries -- one with NPA 200, and one
without.

So, from my perspective, NPA 200 would be the easiest to implement,
since it already is implemented.  

What would be needed is for the individual switchers to set the asterisk
boxes to accept either 1200NXXXXXX or 1NXXXXXX.

I believe that some of us already are setup for that. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] 
> On Behalf Of Mark Rudholm
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 11:42 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Numbering - existing use of 311
> 
> Steph Kerman wrote:
> > Actually, 311 is being used  in some places within the 
> NANP.  NYC uses 
> > it for non-emergency calls to municipal agencies to get these calls 
> > off 911.  ISTR talk about something similar being proposed 
> for a city 
> > in the SF Bay Area a few years ago, perhaps San Jose.
> 
> That makes "311" less attractive, since it couldn't be used 
> in a 10D dialing scheme, but it still could be used in 1+10D dialing.
> 
> But regardless of the "NPA" used, is this question not on the 
> table?  Are people integrating numbering?  If so, how?
> 
> -Mark
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
>