[VoIP] Numbering - cost of power
Steph Kerman
stfkerman at jps.net
Sun May 27 19:43:04 CDT 2007
Electromechanical switches often consume very little or actually no
power at all at 48V when idle. Any continuous power consumption is
usually the standby loss in the 120VAC to 48V DC power conversion . If
you find an efficient switcher, that can be very low too.
Avoid ferro-resonant supplies, which are expensive to idle. Besides
the acoustic noise, even a linear supply can be more efficient because
if the load duty cycle is low, as it usually is in a hobby exchange, the
power loss from heat dissipation in the linear regulation can be more
than compensated by low standby consumption. Of course if there were
heavy traffic, quite the opposite would be true. But keeping a line
frequency transformer powered is likely to cost more than keeping a
switcher powered.
Steph
Mark Rudholm wrote:
> Plus, I pay up to 27 cents per kWh, so I'm averse to any significant constant electrical loads.
>
> Hmm, what's the smallest, not necessarily vintage, real switch that could provide DTF coin service and wouldn't eat a lot of electricity?
>
More information about the VoIP
mailing list