[VoIP] Number portability in CNET

[Dennis D Hock]

Owww  Thats gonna leave a mark permanently huh!  ;-)

Dennis Hock

-----voip-bounces at ckts.info wrote: -----


To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
From: "Greg Blakely" <greg at vyger.net>
Sent by: voip-bounces at ckts.info
Date: 10/31/2007 09:22PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Number portability in CNET

I'm thinking "dueling pistols..."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info]
> On Behalf Of Arthur Bloom
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:32 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Number portability in CNET
>
> Who would give permission to allow the use of, say, 1000
> numbers, or 100 or even 1 number?  The person who originally
> hoarded...excuse me..."reserved"
> the code?  Or the Chief Enum Coordination Officer?  It seems
> like a conflict might lead to bad feelings.  I agree with the
> others who say that area codes are the best long-range plan.
>

_______________________________________________
VoIP mailing list
VoIP at ckts.info
http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/