[VoIP] Help with getting SOMETHING to get onto CNET
Jayson Smith
ratguy at insightbb.com
Sat Nov 3 01:31:01 CST 2007
Sounds like an interesting project. About twenty or so years ago, I had some
plastic toy telephones probably like you describe. Don't know if they were
Radio Shack, but they had a hookswitch, and ten pushbuttons, 1-0, in their
proper place on a DTMF pad. No star or pound. I think the way they worked,
not sure if they were wired or radio, but anyway, I think you picked up one,
and hit any touchtone button, and that rang the other phone, actually it
kind of buzzed. When the called party answered, you could talk. I never
really played with them that terribly much, and by the time I had thought of
wondering how they worked from a technical standpoint, they'd either broken
or gotten lost, I can't remember which.
Jayson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Spock71" <spock71 at paonline.com>
To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:04 AM
Subject: [VoIP] Help with getting SOMETHING to get onto CNET
> For 3 months now, I've been wanting to join CNET and get SOMETHING set up
> so I can dial in and listen to all the test numbers, recordings,
> monitor-lines, etc. that you guys have set up, but unfortunately, I've
> been wasting alot of time with trying to get an Asterisk solution that
> would work 24/7, AND not have a fan in it [I HATE FANS running 24/7], i.e.
> a thin client PC (or even a router like the WRT-54g which I still haven't
> used yet, that I've heard can be turned into a thin client and run
> Asterisk). The only thing I've managed to do so far is get
> Asteriskwin32.com's version of the software, and I've been toying around
> with the extensions.cfg and sip & iax.cfg files to get a better
> understanding of how to set up trunks and lines, only to find my efforts
> were in vain: I couldn't even get an extension "81" to dial into FWD to
> dial my '547881' number I've got on a phone on my Sipura SPA-2002. I did
> however manage to set up the Sipura's 2nd FXS port to access my
> asteriskwin32
> .com server (running on my reg. pc) and get ext.#71 assigned to it and get
> it to register.
> My ultimate goal is a bit unusual though:
> When my lil cousin and I were pre-teens in the early-to-mid '70s (oo I let
> cat-out-of-bag about age), I had gotten 5 Radio Shack plastic
> intercom-telephones and had 'em all wired together at first, and then lil
> Eddie (my cousin) wanted to be a switchboard operator when ever he
> visited, so I build a small slanted switch panel with mini-phone
> connectors, rocker switches, LEDs, and cords so he could sit and switch
> calls between my aunt, mother, dad, Cousin Brenda, etc. all throughout our
> home. The intercoms where vanilla-colored on the outside, and had a
> dark-yellow call button that sent 9 volts down the line (from the 9V
> batt. each of 'em had within) meant to signal only 1 other phone tied to
> it. Eddie's board had mini red push-buttons to send the 9V thru the cords
> to whatever ext. phone he plugged 'em into, (after I ran lines from all 5
> phones to the board), and you could hear a beep LOUDLY at the called ext.,
> and "softly" on the caller's (and Eddie's) hand/headsets when Edd
> ie pushed the signal button associated to one of the two cordsets he
> plugged up to an ext. The handsets (extensions) also had a very small
> switchhook that controlled power to the lil mini audio amp within each
> handset so it wouldn't drain power when not in use. However, the phones
> had no dial mechanism or way to SELECT anything. About a year (or was it
> two) later, after my 13th birthday, I came up with an ingenious idea:
> Why not do a selecting scheme similar to what the railroad company
> (ConRail) does with their radios (since Eddie's dad, my Uncle Ed worked
> for them)): use a mic-keying, numerical window-timing system to select
> extensions?! So, on paper, I drew up a relay-driven selecting mechanism
> using resistor-capacitor circuit elements on the relays' coils to perform
> the delayed timing of the "group-window-digits" control relays (as I USED
> to call them). 2 different progression tones (low, and then high-pitched)
> would tell the caller to start and/or continue with the slow clicking of
> the digit they desired. The entire mechanism could only handle 2 digits
> (but could of course be expanded). I also came up with a scheme to use
> only 1 of the mechanisms (I'll call it the "dial" circuit from now on) and
> make it commonly shared with all 5 extensions (like a mini-LINEFINDER
> Strowger switch, [or maybe a PLUNGER lineswitch]), using flip-flop AND-OR
> logic solid-state SSI integrated circuits. Unf
> ortunately, the project never materialized as I had aspired it, because of
> school, then my first job, and then eventually my stint with the U.S.M.C.
> for 4 years; added to that, my dad's passing that put me into a VA
> hospital for awhile, followed by a career with the Commonwealth of
> Pennsylvania, and then a breakdown, which forced me back into part-time
> employment.
>
> NOW that I've discovered CNET, this aspiration of mine (and maybe still
> Eddie's) can possibly become a REALITY. I'd like to construct the dial
> circuit AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY ENVISIONED with the relays/old logic
> circuits, find some more of those R.S. plastic telephone-intercoms, and
> tie 'em both into an Asterisk box via an interface. The interface would
> generate DTMF into an FXO port as well as receive DTMF (OR even
> dial-pulse, if Asterisk can generate dial-pulses) to complete calls both
> ways, and ringback tone would be generated by combining 2 or 3
> slightly-off-tuned RC audio oscillator mini-circuits (just the same way it
> sounded when we had 2 or 3 of the phones tied to the same line and they
> ALL rang together - the effect heard was very interesting). Of course
> only the plastic intercoms and an MGCP-type telephone VoIP adapter for
> each intercom phone would be needed at Eddie's home since I plan to decode
> pulses from his phones in MY home. I'd also like to connect antiquated
> answering machines to some of these intercom lines (bypassing the
> machines' ring-sense relays) so that people could call/pulse into them and
> listen to various recordings or messages to hear the quality and operation
> of the machines (like the old Code-a-Phone 111 or the T.A.D. Avanti
> answering machines).
>
> I'm SURE at least a few of you out there would get a real EAR-FULL of
> unusual activity dialing into my lil network, IF I ever get it set up. I
> understand also that there's a patch to allow audio to pass back during
> the "signalling" or progression stage(s) of calls through Asterisk (which
> may be of benefit in this type of setup). Callers from CNET (without
> plasic R.S. intercoms, lol) could use the "0" DTMF digit to "pulse out"
> into my "dial circuit" of relays, which will have a number assigned just
> for IT, ...or simply dial to the 'plastic extensions' (of which there'll
> be 2-digit number-assignments) directly.
> So, if this aspiration ever materializes, all CNET members will be able to
> reach all extensions on the "Plastic Network". When I am ready to begin
> building the dial circuit and attempt to aquire about 15 of those old
> Radio Shack intercoms (IF I can find any anywhere anymore), I'd like to
> reserve the prefix 652, but not the ENTIRE prefix. If possible,
> reservation of "652-2xxx" would be MORE than sufficient for my "Plastic
> Network" as well as a dozen other numbers I'd like to have for
> family/friends/my 2 godkids, as well as some other interesting ideas I
> have (a few oddball ones, like a Plastic Network MilliWatt and Loop-Around
> test #s, a "water-sample" report desk mic monitor line so my mother can
> sit down and give a 10-minute report of her volunteer water sampling
> results of area Cumberland County streams and rivers on a weekly or
> bi-weekly basis (mainly to be used for auto-recording by Asterisk servers,
> a line to dial into my Amateur Radio receiver's audio output and use D
> TMF to set it's VFO (frequency), a home-automation control line
> (PIN-protected) for my own personal use to turn on/off lights and AC/heat,
> and whatever other unusual applications I might dream up.
>
> FIRST things first however: I'd like to get an Asterisk box (or actually
> an Asterisk appliance) up and running so I can learn .cfg file principles
> without relying on this PC and a somewhat inefficient version of Asterisk
> (AsteriskWin32) on an intermittent level. After THAT, I believe the fun
> begins, as it was like "back in the day".
>
> Jeff Kauffman KA3RXE (Amateur Radio Callsign)
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
More information about the VoIP
mailing list