[VoIP] Returning CNET numbers

[Greg Blakely]

I should have noted that this is not mandatory for those who currently
hold blocks of 10,000.  But donations back into the pool would be
gratefully accepted. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] 
> On Behalf Of Greg Blakely
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:39 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> 
> It's not automated yet, but, if you would, please send me 
> what blocks of 1000 you wish to KEEP under your current 
> assignments, and I will 'free up' the others.
> 
> Almost there on the automated part of things, but not quite.
> 
> Some of you have already volunteered what blocks you want to give up.
> If you have done so, there is no need to respond to THIS message. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: voip-bounces at ckts.info 
> [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] On Behalf 
> > Of Dennis D Hock
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 7:39 AM
> > To: pd at pd1.org.uk; Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> > Cc: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> > Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> > 
> > Pete,
> > 
> > No problem, I think we are all interested in different ways 
> to do it.  
> > I think Greg aklready has a method in moind to allow an 
> automated sign 
> > up so maybe he needs to know all the blocks for that system he is 
> > implementing.
> > Not sure.
> > 
> > Dennis
> > 
> > -----voip-bounces at ckts.info wrote: -----
> > 
> > 
> > To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches <voip at ckts.info>
> > From: Peter Duffield <pd at pd1.org.uk>
> > Sent by: voip-bounces at ckts.info
> > Date: 11/17/2007 02:25PM
> > Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> > 
> > Dennis/John
> > 
> > I don't really wish to interfere in something that doesn't 
> affect us 
> > here in the UK, but might it not be an idea if you amended 
> the reserve 
> > list to show only the block(s) you are keeping.  This will 
> indicate to 
> > others that the ones you aren't using are available and Greg can 
> > change the routing as and when required rather than hit him 
> with a lot 
> > of changes all at once.
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:16:34 -0500, Dennis D Hock 
> > <hockd at dteenergy.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >Lee,
> > >
> > >In the document just issued it indicates in the fifth
> > paragraph, if I
> > >counted correctly, that "Existing collectors will be
> > grandfathered with
> > the
> > >old system of 10,000 number assignments but will be asked 
> to donate 
> > >back
> > to
> > >the pool any blocks they are actively using."
> > >
> > >I think as in Johns xcase there are several of us , myself 
> included 
> > >just wanting to make sure Greg and or whoever is ready to
> > receive these
> > >back into the pool.  Recall in the following paragraph it
> > referecnces a
> > >sign up for numbers when you are ready by merely accessing
> > the web site
> > >to see
> > what
> > >blocks are available.  I have parapharsed the paragragh 
> here so you 
> > >might want to read it in its entirety.  I think we just 
> want to make 
> > >sure that
> > we
> > >are ready to display these numbers to others looking to 
> sign up for a
> > block
> > >of numbers.
> > >
> > >Hope that helps some.
> > >
> > >Dennis Hock
> > >
> > >-----voip-bounces at ckts.info wrote: -----
> > >
> > >
> > >To: "'Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches'" <voip at ckts.info>
> > >From: "Lee Spenadel" <lee at spenadel.com> Sent by: 
> > voip-bounces at ckts.info
> > >Date: 11/17/2007 12:16PM
> > >Subject: Re: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> > >
> > >Aren't existing allocations Grand Fathered?
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info]
> > On Behalf
> > >Of john jones
> > >Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 11:21 AM
> > >To: voip at ckts.info
> > >Subject: [VoIP] Returning CNET numbers
> > >
> > >Greg,
> > >
> > >Are you ready for people to start turning back numbers or
> > should that
> > >process be delayed a bit until any necessary system 
> changes are made?
> > >
> > >
> > >I currently have all of 688 and only need 688-8xxx
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >John
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >VoIP mailing list
> > >VoIP at ckts.info
> > >http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> > >Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >VoIP mailing list
> > >VoIP at ckts.info
> > >http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> > >Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/ 
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >VoIP mailing list
> > >VoIP at ckts.info
> > >http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> > >Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > VoIP mailing list
> > VoIP at ckts.info
> > http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> > Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > VoIP mailing list
> > VoIP at ckts.info
> > http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> > Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
>