[VoIP] Number portability in CNET

[Arthur Bloom]

Who would give permission to allow the use of, say, 1000 numbers, or 100 or 
even 1 number?  The person who originally hoarded...excuse me..."reserved" 
the code?  Or the Chief Enum Coordination Officer?  It seems like a conflict 
might lead to bad feelings.  I agree with the others who say that area codes 
are the best long-range plan.

APB, Pres.

SHelterisland Telefon, Telegraf & Telewombat Company (SHiTTTCo)

Providing service for nearly a hundredth of a century.


    1-749-0100  CN
631-749-0100  VZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jayson Smith" <ratguy at insightbb.com>
To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Number portability in CNET


| I'm probably hopelessly late on my reply, but by default, the entire 
office
| code is assigned to one person, and that person has all 10000 lines to 
play
| with. However, one or more lines can have their Enum records changed to
| point at someone else.
| Jayson
|
| ----- Original Message ----- 
| From: "Steph Kerman" <stfkerman at jps.net>
| To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
| Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 12:13 PM
| Subject: Re: [VoIP] Number portability in CNET
|
|
| > How does this fit in with David's comment?
| >
| > If the full 7-digit number is looked up in ENUM for each call to allow
| > sharing of office codes doesn't that require ENUM to be updated for all
| > new line assignments at local switches?  I thought only the 3-digit
| > office code was being looked up and that there was discussion about
| > extending this to the thousands digit to allow sharing of office codes
| > in blocks of 1000 numbers, but that it had not been done.
| >
| > Steph
| >
| > Shane Young wrote:
| >> There is no need to do either.
| >>
| >> Since we always lookup every number in DNS via ENUM, greg just points
| >> the "ported" number to the new destination.
| >>
| >> It's a lot like the way real LNP works.
| >> --Shane
| >>
| >>
| >> Quoting Steph Kerman <stfkerman at jps.net>:
| >>
| >>
| >>> Send by redirecting at the originating point or send by tandeming
| >>> through your system?
| >>>
| >>> Steph
| >>>
| >>> David Josephson wrote:
| >>>
| >>>> I think that anyone who has an office code should be able to provide
| >>>> routing to other CNET numbers, should anyone else have a desire for a
| >>>> code in that prefix. I am in the process of constructing a 411 
service
| >>>> to live at 555-1212, and I do have 555-2368 ringing on my desk. But 
if
| >>>> someone wanted another 555 number I'd be happy to write a line in the
| >>>> dialplan to send calls somewhere else.
| >>>>
| >>>> --
| >>>> David Josephson
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>> _______________________________________________
| >>> VoIP mailing list
| >>> VoIP at ckts.info
| >>> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
| >>> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >> --Shane
| >> +1-821-7311 CNET
| >>
| >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
| >>
| >> _______________________________________________
| >> VoIP mailing list
| >> VoIP at ckts.info
| >> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
| >> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
| >>
| >>
| > _______________________________________________
| > VoIP mailing list
| > VoIP at ckts.info
| > http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
| > Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
| >
| >
| > -- 
| > No virus found in this incoming message.
| > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
| > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.16/1102 - Release Date:
| > 10/31/2007 4:38 PM
| >
| >
| _______________________________________________
| VoIP mailing list
| VoIP at ckts.info
| http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
| Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
|
|
| -- 
| No virus found in this incoming message.
| Checked by AVG Free Edition.
| Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.15/1101 - Release Date: 
10/31/2007 10:06 AM
|
|