[VoIP] Number portability in CNET

[Arthur Bloom]

I'm sorry; I didn't realize that staleness was setting in, as I, as a new 
guy, have only just recently been made aware of the potential problems in 
the current numbering plan.  I just don't want to offend someone who might 
want to use 749 or a portion of it, and have them find out that I am the 
impediment to their pursuit of happiness.

APB, Pres.
Shelter Island Bridge & Tunnel Authority
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/05/22/060522ta_talk_collins2

1+(xxx)-749-0100



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Josephson" <david at josephson.com>
To: "Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches" <voip at ckts.info>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [VoIP] Number portability in CNET


| This thread is getting stale, but to recap, my suggestion would be to
| suggest that those holding unused office codes (for more than six
| months, say) provide redirect service for anyone who needed, er, wanted
| a group within their "prefix." I would certainly be willing to do that
| on the office codes I have, even though they are online and connected to
| an EM switch. If the affected office were unable or unwilling to provide
| that service, the petitioner would then be free to ask the Chief Enum
| Coordination Officer to do so.
|
| "Consensus is the absence of sustained objection."
|
| --
| David Josephson 1-555-2368
| > Who would give permission to allow the use of, say, 1000 numbers, or 100 
or
| > even 1 number?  The person who originally hoarded...excuse 
me..."reserved"
|
| _______________________________________________
| VoIP mailing list
| VoIP at ckts.info
| http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
| Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
|
|
| -- 
| No virus found in this incoming message.
| Checked by AVG Free Edition.
| Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.15/1101 - Release Date: 
10/31/2007 10:06 AM
|
|