[VoIP] Office code reservation was Number portability in CNET

[Greg Blakely]

A non-issue, as it were?  

Probably.  

I know that most people tend to get way ahead of themselves when it
comes to worrying about things -- especially such things of paramount
importance, such as torture of detainees, global warming, terrorism, the
axis of evil, and CNET office codes.

But I'd suggest that we take that proverbial 'chill pill,' and burn that
bridge as we come to it. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: voip-bounces at ckts.info [mailto:voip-bounces at ckts.info] 
> On Behalf Of Paul Wills
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:20 PM
> To: Voice Over IP Tandem for Analog Switches
> Subject: [VoIP] Office code reservation was Number portability in CNET
> 
> Has there actually been a problem with someone wanting a 
> prefix that was reserved by someone else that has not been 
> resolved by a little cooperation between the parties involved.
> 
> I think we're blowing this whole thing out of proportion.  
> The "informality" 
> of CNET is precisely what makes it work.
> 
> PDW 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
> 
>