[VoIP] Polycom SoundPoint IP301 SIP

Steph Kerman stfkerman at jps.net
Thu Feb 21 22:08:30 CST 2008


Thanks.  I'm not surprised.  I'm inclined to believe that most ATAs are 
crap from a VF quality viewpoint.

=SK=

Mark Rudholm wrote:
> That should work.  All things being equal, I find my Polycom
> delivers better sound quality than an analog phone on an ATA
> or an FXO port.
>
> Steph Kerman wrote:
>   
>> Thanks Mark.
>>
>> I suppose it could be remoted off another * as long as there is 
>> broadband service.  Is that correct?
>>
>> Steph
>>
>> Mark Rudholm wrote:
>>     
>>> Polycom phones are very highly regarded in the VoIP community.
>>> They are considered by almost everyone I talk to who is knowledgeable
>>> as the best.  I have an IP550 on my desk at home and I love it.
>>> It can be configured via TFTP or with a web interface.
>>>
>>> Shane Young wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> The Polycom IP phones are some of the best on the market, however they  
>>>> can be less than friendly to configure sometimes.
>>>>
>>>> Once you have it configured, they are rock solid.
>>>>
>>>> The 301 is a monitor type speaker phone (no microphone) and has a  
>>>> low-end display (segments, rather than pixels, if I recall)
>>>>
>>>> I have a 601 on my desk at home and at work.
>>>>
>>>> The company I work for primarily sells only Polycom phones.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Steph Kerman <stfkerman at jps.net>:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Does anyone have direct experience using these in any application?  If
>>>>> so, do they work well and install in a reasonably deterministic way or
>>>>> are the riddled with bugs, weirdnesses and unexpected misbehaviors?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> --Shane
>>>> +1-821-7311 CNET
>>>>         
> _______________________________________________
> VoIP mailing list
> VoIP at ckts.info
> http://lists.ckts.info/mailman/listinfo/voip
> Project Web Page: http://www.ckts.info/
>
>   


More information about the VoIP mailing list